SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
N/A, N/A
Chirag Aggarwal v. Ansal Phalak Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd.


Advocates:
For the Complainants: N/A
For the Respondents: N/A

Table of Content
1. details of the complainants' application and delay in possession. (Para 1 , 4)
2. arguments regarding the complainants' consumer status and perceived business intentions. (Para 6 , 10 , 15)
3. court observations on delivery timelines and conditions warranting a refund. (Para 8 , 17)
4. adjudication of the main legal issue regarding delay in possession and deficiency of service. (Para 19)
5. final ruling regarding the complaint and outcome. (Para 20)

1. According to the Complainants on 19/09/2012, they applied for allotment of a residential unit in the project "Sovereign Floors", Esencia, Sector - 67, Gurgaon Haryana developed by the Opposite Party. The unit was booked for residential purpose of the Complainants. The Opposite Party allotted residential unit No. D - 1567 - SF, 2nd Floor, vide allotment letter dated 26/09/2012. Consideration payable was Rs.1,60,00,000 for the 2198 sq. ft. unit. Pursuant to the allotment letter, the Complainants and Opposite Party signed Floor Buyer Agreement dated 05/10/2012. According to the Agreement, in case of delay in payment, the Complainants were required to pay interest @ 18% p.a. for three months and 21% p.a. beyond the delay of































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top