Back
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Subhash Chandra, Member
Mr. Subhash Chandra – Appellant
Versus
M/s Sunil Pharma – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to insurance compensation ruling. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments addressing evidence and procedural elements. (Para 4 , 10) |
| 3. court's analysis of concurrent factual findings. (Para 5 , 6 , 11) |
| 4. legal standards on revisional jurisdiction. (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 5. conclusion affirming lower court's decision. (Para 12) |
1. Mr. Subhash Chandra, Member - This revision petition assails the order dated 23.9.2011 of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Bihar, Patna (in short, 'State Commission') in First Appeal No. 633 of 2007 by which the order of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Gaya (in short, the 'District Forum') dated 18.10.2007 in consumer complaint number 117 of 2006 was upheld. The impugned order of the District Forum has directed the revision petitioner / Insurance Company to pay Rs.14,74,000 along with interest at 8% per annum from 15.9.2006 till realization along with Rs.2,000 by way of compensation for mental agony and litigation cost.
2. The facts of the case, in brief, are that the complainant / respondent M/s Sunil Pharma who is a wholesale stockist of medicines, had obtained a shop insurance policy for Fire and Burglary for an
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
