Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
T.S. Thakur, ACJ
M/s Kuldeep Kumar Contractor v. Hindustan Prefab Limited
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks appointment of arbitrator. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. petitioner invokes arbitration clause for dispute resolution. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. petitioner emphasizes duty under arbitration agreement. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 4. respondent argues against arbitration, claims no dispute. (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30) |
| 5. court analyzes jurisdiction and arbitration clause validity. (Para 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42) |
| 6. court discusses kompetenz-kompetenz principle. (Para 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50) |
| 7. court decides to refer dispute to arbitration. (Para 51 , 52 , 53 , 54) |
| 8. order for arbitrator appointment and proceedings. (Para 55 , 56 , 57) |
1. The instant petition has been filed on behalf of the petitioner under S.11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act, 1996") seeking the appointment of a sole Arbitrator and inter alia praying as under:
"a. appoint an independent and impartial Sole Arbitrator, in terms of the Dispute Resolution clause, as contained in the contract - Agreement and the provisions of the ; so as to adjudicate the dispu
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
