Back
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Dinesh Singh (Presiding Member), Karuna Nand Bajpayee (Member)
Experion Developers Pvt. Ltd. v. Sandhya Ram
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. pecuniary jurisdiction depends on the value of consideration paid. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 2. arguments reflect discrepancies in understanding jurisdiction. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 3. housing construction is classified as a service under the act. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 4. court allowed the appeal, setting aside the state commission's order. (Para 12) |
1. This appeal under S.51(1) of the Act 2019 is in challenge to the Order dated 30.11.2021 of the State Commission in complaint No. 07 of 2021.
2. We have heard the learned Counsel for the appellants and for the respondents and have perused the record including inter alia the impugned Order dated 30.11.2021 of the State Commission and the memorandum of appeal.
3. The State Commission, vide its impugned Order of 30.11.2021, has decided the preliminary issue re - pecuniary jurisdiction. The gist of its examination, as contained in paras 5 to 11 of its Order, is being reproduced below for reference:
5. The suit has been instituted in the year 2021. Therefore, the provisions of the new Act, Consumer Protection Act, 2019 , after the date commencement of the new Act, i.e. 20.7.2020, shall apply to this matter as per the judgement passed by the Hon'ble Sup
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
