Back
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Deepa Sharma (Presiding Member)
Bellad Engineering Co. Ltd. v. S. Hanumanthappa
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of case facts surrounding vehicle purchase and delivery dispute. (Para 1 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. arguments regarding delivery evidence and contractual obligations. (Para 2 , 10 , 13) |
| 3. court's assessment of evidence and confirmation of previous rulings. (Para 3 , 7 , 8 , 11) |
| 4. final ruling on the case and dismissal of the revision petition. (Para 9 , 14) |
1. The present Revision Petition has been filed by the Petitioners against the order dated 28.2.2023 of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Karanataka (for short "the State Commission") in Appeal No. 1472 of 2014 filed by the Petitioner against the order dated 15.7.2014 of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Chitradurga (for short "the District Forum") in Complaint No. 2/2014 filed by the Complainant (Respondent No. 1 herein). The Appeal was dismissed on the ground that the Petitioner could not produce the document to prove that the vehicle which was purchased by the Complainant / Respondent No. 1 had been delivered to him.
2. It is argued by learned Counsel for the Petitioners that the vehicle was delivered in fact to the brother - in - law (name not known) of the Complainant and therefor
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
