1. The present Revision Petition has been filed by the Petitioners against the order dated 28.2.2023 of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Karanataka (for short "the State Commission") in Appeal No. 1472 of 2014 filed by the Petitioner against the order dated 15.7.2014 of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Chitradurga (for short "the District Forum") in Complaint No. 2/2014 filed by the Complainant (Respondent No. 1 herein). The Appeal was dismissed on the ground that the Petitioner could not produce the document to prove that the vehicle which was purchased by the Complainant / Respondent No. 1 had been delivered to him.

2. It is argued by learned Counsel for the Petitioners that the vehicle was delivered in fact to the brother - in - law (name not known) of the Complainant and therefore, the concurrent findings of the Foras below on this fact are perverse and are liable to be set aside.

3. I have heard the arguments and perused the record.

4. The brief admitted facts of the case are that the Complainant, who is an agriculturist, had bought a goods carriage vehicle from the Petitioner in the month of February 2013 for a total sum of Rs.11,60,659. He took a