Back
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
A, J
Indraprastha Apollo Hospital – Appellant
Versus
Haryana State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of the case and initial findings (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. parties' arguments and core issues framed by the court (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. court's observations on negligence and expert opinions (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 4. final determination on liability (Para 17) |
| 5. outcome of the appeals (Para 18) |
1. This Order shall decide both the First Appeals arising from the impugned Judgment / Order dated 26.11.2012 passed by the Haryana State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Panchkula (hereinafter referred to as the "State Commission") in Consumer Complaint No. 24/2006, wherein the State Commission allowed the complaint and awarded Rs.6 lakh compensation to be paid by all the OPs.
2. For the convenience the parties are referred to be as in the Complaint before the State Commission.
3. The Complainants are legal heirs of deceased Smt. Asha Rani Gurdhar. The Opposite Parties are OP - 1 - Kakkar Maternity and Nursing Home (OP - 1), Dr. Rajesh Kakkar (OP - 2), Dr. Abhishek Kakkar (OP - 3) and Dr. Sunil Bajaj - The Medical Officer of Kakkar Hospital (OP - 4). Dr. Anant Ram Janta Hospital Barwala (OP - 5) and Indraprastha Apollo Hospital, New
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
