Back
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Mr. Pravin Bahadur, Ms. Twinkle Rathi, JJ
Satya Prakash Jain – Appellant
Versus
IVR Prime Urban Developers Limited – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. parties' representations and agreement details. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. existence and acknowledgment of delays in construction responsibilities. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. maintenance of original jurisdictional agreement to resolve disputes. (Para 5) |
| 4. requirement to pursue arbitration as determined by preceding civil suit ruling. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 5. clarification on the conditions of contract fruitfulness based on participation. (Para 8 , 9) |
1. Heard Mr. Pravin Bahadur, Advocate, for the complainant and Ms. Twinkle Rathi, Advocate, for the opposite party.
2. Satya Prakash Jain has filed above complaint, for directing the opposite party to (i) deliver possession of built - up area of his share as per Development Agreement dated 20.4.2007; (ii) pay Rs.5000000 as compensation for deficiency in service; (iii) pay Rs.100000 as the costs of litigation; and (iv) any other relief which is deemed fit and proper in the facts of the case.
3. The complainant stated that IVR Prime Urban Developers Limited (the opposite party) was a company, registered under the Companies Act, 1956 and engaged in the business of development and construction of group housing project. The complainant purchased Plot No. 72,
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
