1. Heard Mr. Pravin Bahadur, Advocate, for the complainant and Ms. Twinkle Rathi, Advocate, for the opposite party.

2. Satya Prakash Jain has filed above complaint, for directing the opposite party to (i) deliver possession of built - up area of his share as per Development Agreement dated 20.4.2007; (ii) pay Rs.5000000 as compensation for deficiency in service; (iii) pay Rs.100000 as the costs of litigation; and (iv) any other relief which is deemed fit and proper in the facts of the case.

3. The complainant stated that IVR Prime Urban Developers Limited (the opposite party) was a company, registered under the Companies Act, 1956 and engaged in the business of development and construction of group housing project. The complainant purchased Plot No. 72, Cyber Enclave, Madhapur Village, Srilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, through sale deed dated 14.10.2005 and was owner of it. The opposite party approached the complainant and represented that it had varied experience in the field of development and construction of the building and had a good will for raising high quality constructions and completing on time. Believing upon the representations of the opposite party, the compla