NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Anil Srivastava, J
Bajaj Capital Limited – Appellant
Versus
Vijay Tak – Respondent
1. This Revision Petition has been filed by the Petitioner / Opposite Party No. 2 against Respondents / Complainants and Opposite Parties Nos. 1 & 3 challenging the impugned Order dated 9.1.2017 passed by the Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Jaipur, Rajasthan, in First Appeal bearing No. 890 of 2016. vide such order, the State Commission dismissed the Appeal at the stage of admission while upholding the Order dated 30.3.2016 passed by the District Consumer Protection Forum, Ajmer, in Complaint No. 19/2015.
2. The brief facts of the case are that the Complainants had invested Rs.5,50,000 with the Opposite Party No. 1 through Opposite Party No. 2 in a Fixed Deposit Scheme of 36 month sunder Cumulative of Fixed Deposit Scheme (B) of the Opposite Party No. 1 vide receipt Nos. 5413 to 5417 on 3.6.2011 and receipt Nos. 10641 to 10642 on 11.8.2011. The payment of 5 FDRs matured on 2.6.2014 amounting to Rs.4,27,000 and payment of 2 FDRs matured on10.8.2014 amounting to Rs.3,56,440. The Complainant approached the Opposite Party No. 2 several times for payment of maturity amounts. However, the employees of the Opposite Party No. 2 did not give any satisfactory reply and kept lingering
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.