NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Ram Surat Ram Maurya (Presiding Member) Dr. Inder Jit Singh (Member)
Mrs. Madhugita Madhukar Sukhatme – Appellant
Versus
M/s. Yogesh & Yogesh Developers – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. initial complaint details and contractual obligations. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. discussion on development agreement and consumer rights. (Para 4 , 5 , 9) |
| 3. evidences of compliance and objections related to occupancy. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 4. final order on documentation provision. (Para 14) |
1. Heard Mr. Uday B. Wavikar, Advocate, for the complainant and Mr. Anirudha Valsangkar, Advocate, for the opposite parties.
2. Mrs. Madhugita Madhukar Sukhatme has filed above complaint for directing the opposite parties to (i) provide office space for the condominium, watchman cabin, Fire refuge area on 8th floor, replace one lift with Stretcher lift; (ii) handover 9 remaining parking space i.e. 7 stilt parking and 2 open parking, within stipulated period; (iii) obtain "completion certificate" of the building 'Manas Apartment Condominium', within stipulated period, failing which pay penalty of Rs. 5000 per day; (iv) handover certified copy all the documents relating to construction of "Manas Apartment Condominium" and other facilities and amenities; (v) pay Rs. 1250000 as delay compensation, from 2.12.2014 to 13.1.2017 with interest @18% per annum, from 13.1.2017 till the date of payment; (vi)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.