Back
DELHI STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL (PRESIDENT), PINKI (MEMBER), J.P. AGRAWAL (MEMBER)
Anand Kumar v. TDI Infrastructure Ltd.
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. allegations of service deficiency from delayed possession and unexpected charges. (Para 1 , 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. failure of the opposite party to respond to allegations and meet deadlines. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. definition of deficiency in service under the relevant act and its implications. (Para 8 , 10 , 12) |
| 4. court orders regarding possession, financial reparation, and harassment. (Para 14 , 15 , 16) |
1. The present complaint has been filed by the Complainants before this commission alleging deficiency of service on the part of Opposite Party and has prayed the following reliefs:
(a) To hand over the peaceful and vacant possession of unit no. 902 on the Ninth Floor of tower 10
(b) To withdraw the letter dated 11.9.2018 more particularly to drop the demand of Rs. 7,96,263.70
(c) To pay a sum of Rs. 5,00,000 as damages / compensation for keeping the complainants in dark about alteration in area, demanding and accepting money in excess of the amount payable for the area being allotted, further delay in handing over the possession and mental agony and harassment.
(d) To pay compounded interest @18% on the total amount collected from the complainants for the period of delay in offer
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
