NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Judge, J
Hyundai Motor India Pvt. Ltd. v. Harpal Singh
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. consumer claims address warranty and service failures. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. parties dispute service obligations and responsibilities. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. court reviews manufacturing defect claims and service responses. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. past cases inform current liability assessments. (Para 10 , 13 , 14) |
| 5. final ruling affirms previous decisions on consumer protection. (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18) |
1. This Revision Petition has been filed by the Petitioner / Opposite Party No. 3 against Respondents / Complainant and Opposite Parties No. 1 and 2 challenging the common impugned Order dated 8.8.2018 passed by the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, U.T. Chandigarh, in First Appeal bearing Nos. 27 of 2018 and 23 of 2018. vide such Order, the State Commission had modified the Order dated 1.12.2017 passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum - II, U.T. Chandigarh, in Consumer Complaint No. 536 of 2017 while deciding the First Appeal bearing No. 27 of 2018. vide the same Order, the Ld. State Commission had also allowed the Appeal bearing No. 23 of 2018 while setting aside the Order of Ld. District Forum qua Opposite Party No.1.
2. The brief facts of the ca
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.