SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(Del) 18336

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
DR. INDER JIT SINGH (PRESIDNG MEMBER )
Umesh Kumar Garg v. State Bank of India


1. The present Revision Petition (RP) has been filed by the Petitioner against Respondents as detailed above, under S.21(b) of Consumer Protection Act 1986, against the order dated 9.8.2018 of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Rajasthan, Jaipur, (hereinafter referred to as the ˜State Commission'), in First Appeal (FA) No. 282 of 2017 in which order dated 25.1.2017 of District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Bharatpur (hereinafter referred to as District Forum) in Consumer Complaint (CC) no 174 of 2010 was challenged, inter alia praying to quash and set aside the order of State Commission.

2. While the Revision Petitioner (hereinafter also referred to as Complainant) was Respondent and the Respondent(s) (hereinafter also referred to as OP) were Appellants in the said FA / 282/2017 before the State Commission, the Revision Petitioner was Complainant and Respondent(s) were OP before the District Commission in the CC No. 174 of 2010. Notice was issued to the Respondents on 21.12.2018. Petitioner filed Written Arguments / Synopsis on 27.3.2023 Respondents did not file written synopsis despite orders dated 26.4.2023 and 19.6.2023.

3. Brief facts of the case, as emerged f

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top