Back
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
DR. INDER JIT SINGH (PRESIDNG MEMBER )
Umesh Kumar Garg v. State Bank of India
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition filed under consumer protection act challenging state commission's order. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. details surrounding the fixed deposit and dispute with the bank. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. argument regarding the bank's liability and service deficiency. (Para 5 , 6 , 8) |
| 4. court's review of evidence and conclusions drawn to uphold state commission's order. (Para 7 , 9) |
| 5. final verdict dismissing the revision petition. (Para 10) |
1. The present Revision Petition (RP) has been filed by the Petitioner against Respondents as detailed above, under S.21(b) of Consumer Protection Act 1986, against the order dated 9.8.2018 of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Rajasthan, Jaipur, (hereinafter referred to as the ˜State Commission'), in First Appeal (FA) No. 282 of 2017 in which order dated 25.1.2017 of District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Bharatpur (hereinafter referred to as District Forum) in Consumer Complaint (CC) no 174 of 2010 was challenged, inter alia praying to quash and set aside the order of State Commission.
2. While the Revision Petitioner (hereinafter also referred to as Complainant) was Respondent and the Respondent(s) (hereinafter also referred to as
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
