Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
, J
ATS Group – Appellant
Versus
Dalmia Group – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitions filed under arbitration act seeking substitution and mandate extension. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments regarding applicability of s.29a after expiration of the mandate. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. court's ruling on interpretation of s.29a allowing application post-expiration. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. final decision to allow extension and dismiss other petitions. (Para 10) |
1. Two of the present petitions1 under S.14(1) read with S.15(2) and S.11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Act) have been filed by the Claimants in the arbitral proceedings, seeking substitution of the Sole Arbitrator Mr. Justice Swatanter Kumar (Retd.).2 The other two petitions3 under S.29A(5) of the Act have been filed by the Respondents in the arbitral proceedings, seeking an extension of the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal, which expired on 31st August, 2023.
2. The ATS group of companies, which includes ATS Infrastructure Ltd., Almond Infrabuild Private Limited, ATS Housing Private Limited, Anand Divine Developers Private Limited and Domus Greens Private Limited (hereinafter together referred to as ATS Group), is the claimant in the arbitral proceedings. The ATS Group, a real est
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
