Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
N/A, N/A
Marfing Tamang – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. definition and communication of grounds of arrest under s.50 crpc (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. arguments contesting legality of arrest and remand (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. details regarding circumstances of arrest and remand application (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 4. state's arguments regarding distinctions of arrest and detention (Para 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 5. court's analysis on compliance with s.50 crpc and constitutional rights (Para 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35) |
| 6. conclusion: remand order set aside; petitioner released under conditions (Para 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42) |
1. This case concerns an analysis of the precise definition of the word "forthwith" as used in S.50 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) and the scope of the legal obligation it imposes on the State to supply the "grounds of arrest" to an arrestee.
2. Byway of the present petition filed under S.482 CrPC, the petitioner impugns order dated 18-5-2024 passed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, Tis Hazari District Courts, Delhi whereby the learned Magistrate remanded the petitioner to police custody for 2 days in case FIR No. 157 of 2024 dated 17-5-2024 registered under S.342/344/365/368/370/370 - A
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
