SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Del) 10631

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
CASTROL LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
VIVEK PRATAP SINGH – Respondent


$~76 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + FAO(OS) (COMM) 77/2025 & CM APPL. 25373/2025 CASTROL LIMITED .....Appellant Through: Mr. Urfee Roomi, Mr. Ritesh, Mr. Ayush, Ms. Chahat and Ms. Vanshika, Advs. versus VIVEK PRATAP SINGH .....Respondent Through:

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE OM PRAKASH SHUKLA JUDGMENT (ORAL)

% 04.12.2025 C. HARI SHANKAR, J.

1. The appellant is one of the leading manufacturers of motor oils in the country.

2. It is a matter of common knowledge that engine oils manufactured by the appellant have been duplicated by several counterfeiters who sell engine oils in cans and containers which are identical in appearance, using marks which are also deceptively similar to those of the appellant.

3. One of us, sitting singly in this Court, has dealt with similar matters in which identical infringements had come up before the Court. As these cases deal with engine oil, and duplicacy can lead even to loss of lives, the Court has to take an extremely serious view where counterfeiting is seen.

4. The appellant is aggrieved by the fact that the learned Single Judge has not passed any order on the appellant’s application under Order XXXIX Rul

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top