SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Del) 10676

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
AMAR JEET & ORS. VS. REGISTRAR COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES & ANR.
W.P.(C) 183/2017



$~6 to 13 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 183/2017 BHUSHAN POWER & STEEL LTD. & ANR .....Petitioners Through: Advocate (appearance not given)

versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Jagdish Chandra Solanki, CGSC for R-UOI with Ms. Maanya Saxena and Mr. Siddharth Bajaj, Advocates.

7 + W.P.(C) 2107/2017 M/S HORIZON LOHA UDYOG PVT LTD AND ANR .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Naveen Kumar, Mr. Prabhat Kumar Rai, Mr. Aditya Goyal, Mr. Ujjawal Kumar Rai, Ms. Isha Baloni, Mr. Utkarsh Chandra, Mr. Rishab Chaudhary, Mr. Sudhanshu Pathak, Mr. Lakshya Singh, Ms. Pragya Prachi Pandey and Ms. Shrijeta Pratik, Advocates.

versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Bhgavan Swaroop Shukla, CGSC for R-UOI with Mr. Yash Baralia, Advocate.

+ W.P.(C) 230/2017 M/S JINDAL STEEL AND POWER LIMITED (JSPL) & ANR .....Petitioners Through: Ms. Gauri Rastogra, Mr. Dinesh Moorjani, Ms. Richa Bhargava and Mr. Gurpreet Singh Bhagga, Advocates.

versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS .....Respondents Through: Mrs. Anubha Bhardwaj, CGSC with Ms. Ananya Shamshery, Advocates.

9 + W.P.(C) 260/2017 M/S. RUNGTA SONS PRIVATE LIMITED ....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sandeep Devashish Das and Ms.

Kanak Malik, Advocates.

versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Premtosh Kumar Mishra, Mr.

Shrey Sharma, Mr. Prakash Tiwari and Mr. Anurag Tiwari Advocates.

10 + W.P.(C) 261/2017 M/S. RUNGTA MINES LIMITED ....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sandeep Devashish Das and Ms.

Kanak Malik, Advocates.

versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Premtosh Kumar Mishra, Mr.

Shrey Sharma, Mr. Prakash Tiwari and Mr. Anurag Tiwari Advocates.

+ W.P.(C) 262/2017 M/S SHRI BAJRANG POWER AND ISPAT LIMITED ....Petitioner Through: Mr. Naveen Kumar, Mr. Prabhat Kumar Rai, Mr. Aditya Goyal, Mr. Ujjawal Kumar Rai, Ms. Isha Baloni, Mr. Utkarsh Chandra, Mr. Rishab Chaudhary, Mr. Sudhanshu Pathak, Mr. Lakshya Singh, Ms. Pragya Prachi Pandey and Ms. Shrijeta Pratik, Advocates.

versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Premtosh Kumar Mishra, Mr.

Shrey Sharma, Mr. Prakash Tiwari and Mr. Anurag Tiwari Advocates.

Mr. Prashant Singh, Mr. Rajnandani Kumari, Advocates for R-State of Chattisgarh.

12 + W.P.(C) 909/2017 M/S SINGHAL STEEL PRIVATE LIMITED AND ANR .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Naveen Kumar, Mr. Prabhat Kumar Rai, Mr. Aditya Goyal, Mr. Ujjawal Kumar Rai, Ms. Isha Baloni, Mr. Utkarsh Chandra, Mr. Rishab Chaudhary, Mr. Sudhanshu Pathak, Mr. Lakshya Singh, Ms. Pragya Prachi Pandey and Ms. Shrijeta Pratik, Advocates.

versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Rakesh Kumar, SPC with Mr.

Sunil, Advocate for R-UOI Mr. Prashant Singh, Mr. Rajnandani Kumari, Advocates for R-State of Chattisgarh.

13 + W.P.(C) 914/2017 M/S SINGHAL STEEL PRIVATE LIMITED AND ANR .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Naveen Kumar, Mr. Prabhat Kumar Rai, Mr. Aditya Goyal, Mr. Ujjawal Kumar Rai, Ms. Isha Baloni, Mr. Utkarsh Chandra, Mr. Rishab Chaudhary, Mr. Sudhanshu Pathak, Mr. Lakshya Singh, Ms. Pragya Prachi Pandey and Ms. Shrijeta Pratik, Advocates.

versus UOI AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Prashant Singh, Mr. Rajnandani Kumari, Advocates for R-State of Chattisgarh.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NITIN WASUDEO SAMBRE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA

O R D E R

% 09.12.2025 CM APPL. 77575/2025 in W.P.(C) 230/2017 (Seeking amendment in the name of petitioner no.1.)

1. For the reasons stated in the application, the application stands allowed.

The amended Memo of Parties be taken on record.

2. The application, accordingly, stands disposed of.

W.P.(C) 183/2017, W.P.(C) 2107/2017, W.P.(C) 230/2017, W.P.(C) 260/2017, W.P.(C) 261/2017, W.P.(C) 262/2017, W.P.(C) 909/2017, &

W.P.(C) 914/2017

3. Counter affidavit filed by respondent-Union of India is directed to be taken on record and tagged with Court file.

4. In view of no objection on behalf of learned counsel for petitioners, counter filed by respondent-Union of India is permitted to be read in all the matter as the same i

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top