SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Del) 10693

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
M/S AASTHA APPARELS PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS. VS. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.


$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 15057/2004 & CM APPLs. 10771/2004, 14241/2004, 167/2005, 1783/2005, 12708/2005 RESERVE BANK OF INDIA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ramesh Babu, Ms. Manisha Singh & Ms. Tanya Chowdhary, Advocates.

versus THE APP. AUTHORITY NBFC REGIST. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sachin Chopra, Ms. Astha Gupta & Ms. Aakriti Jain, Advocates for R-3/DCM Financial Services Limited.

CORAM:

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN

O R D E R

% 09.12.2025 [

1. The Reserve Bank of India [“RBI”] has filed this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, against an order dated 21.05.2004, passed by the Appellate Authority for Non-Banking Financial Company [“NBFC”] Registration, Government of India.

2. Respondent No. 3 – DCM Financial Services Limited [“the company”] applied for a certificate of registration as required under Section 45-IA of the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934 [“the RBI Act”]. The RBI, by an order dated 05.03.2004, rejected the application on the ground that the company had failed to fulfil the statutory eligibility conditions mentioned in Section 45-IA(4) of the RBI Act. The rejection order was challenged by the company before the Appellate Auth

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top