Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
NAVIN CHAWLA, MADHU JAIN, JJ
NISHA KHAN – Appellant
Versus
DELHI POLICE – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual basis for petition derived from completed online application discrepancies. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. arguments on the validity of the clerical errors and requests for corrections. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 3. court's examination of the rules and responsibilities of candidates in the application process. (Para 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31) |
| 4. finality of decision resting on candidate errors during application submissions. (Para 32) |
| 5. affirmation of the dismissal and cost implications. (Para 34) |
JUDGMENT
MADHU JAIN J.
1. This petition has been filed by the petitioner, challenging the Order dated 14.07.2023 passed by the learned Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Tribunal’) in O.A. 2092/2021, titled as Nisha Khan v. Delhi Police & Anr., whereby the learned Tribunal dismissed the above mentioned O.A. and held as under:
“6. We are of the considered view that the issue raised in the instant OA is no more res integra in view of the decision of a Coordinate Benchof this Tribunal inPoojaDevi v.SSC & Ors., decided on 20.02.2023 (where both of us Hon'ble Mr. Anand Mathur, Member (A) and Hon'b
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
