IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
NAVIN CHAWLA, MADHU JAIN, JJ
NISHA KHAN – Appellant
Versus
DELHI POLICE & ANR. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenging tribunal's dismissal based on eligibility criteria. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. procedural obligations and candidate responsibilities in application filling. (Para 4 , 14 , 15) |
| 3. past mistakes cannot qualify for future rectifications after submission. (Para 24 , 26 , 30) |
MADHU JAIN J.
“6. We are of the considered view that the issue raised in the instant OA is no more res integra in view of the decision of a Coordinate Benchof this Tribunal inPoojaDevi v.SSC & Ors., decided on 20.02.2023 (where both of us Hon'ble Mr. Anand Mathur, Member (A) and Hon'ble Mr. Manish Garg, Member (J) were members). The relevant part of the said order reads as follows:
4.1 It is true that the Examination Notice and Recruitment Rules provide for relaxation in height to the wards of police personnel only if an aspiring candidate mentions about the same in the column meant for the same. It is also noticed that the applicant had filled "No" in Column No. 16 while submitting her online application form. It is not disputed that the applicant requested for correction in the aforesaid column when her height was measured less than the requisite height, which is not permissible at a later stag
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.