$~54 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 18.12.2025 + CM(M) 2436/2025, CM APPL. 79842/2025, CM APPL.

79843/2025 & CM APPL. 79841/2025 RINAL INVESTMENT PVT. LTD .....Petitioner Through: Mr. N.P. Singh and Mr. Barun Dey, Advocates versus M/S OMSONS MARKETING PVT. LTD .....Respondent Through: Mr. Irshad Ahmad, Advocate CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA

O R D E R (ORAL)

1. Petitioner/defendant has assailed two orders, both dated 05.12.2025 passed by the learned commercial court, whereby its applications under Order VI Rule 17 CPC and under Order XI Rule 1(10) CPC were dismissed. Having heard learned counsel for petitioner/defendant, I do not find it a fit case to even issue notice. Rather, the petition appears to be an effort to somehow derail the trial.

2. Broadly speaking, when the suit filed by the respondent/plaintiff against the petitioner/defendant for recovery of Rs.17,51,499.38 was listed for plaintiff’s evidence, the petitioner/defendant filed two applications, one D Si i g gi n ta a l t l u y r S e i g N n o ed t Verified G KA IR T I H SH P ALIA DD2dpseD e6 .4o iN a 5 r g 0 3s t i .:4 a i e t 4 5 tc al . : a 0 f2 N = l9 2 l 2 C 0I u 7 0 yN c o = m 6 2 4 s