SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Del) 10821

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
SPORTS AUTHORITY OF INDIA VS. DEEPAK CHOUDHARY & ORS


$~21 to 23 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CONT.CAS(C) 745/2019 & CM APPL. 11774/2021 PARUL JAIN .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ramakant Sharma, and Mr.

Prateek Avasthi, Advs.

versus PANKAJ JAIN .....Respondent Through: Respondent (through VC)

22 CONT.CAS(C) 749/2019 PARUL JAIN .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ramakant Sharma, and Mr.

Prateek Avasthi, Advs.

versus PANKAJ JAIN .....Respondent Through: Respondent (through VC)

23 + CONT.CAS(C) 411/2021 PARUL JAIN .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ramakant Sharma, and Mr.

Prateek Avasthi, Advs.

versus PANKAJ JAIN .....Respondent Through: Respondent (through VC)

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE

O R D E R

% 12.12.2025 CM APPL. 65272/2025 (By respondent seeking correction/modification of order dated 17.09.2025) in CONT.CAS(C) 745/2019

1. Despite specific order dated 17.09.2025, Mr. Pankaj Jain, respondent is once again appearing in person through video conferencing.

He has filed the present application seeking correction/ modification of the said order for recording accurately the proceedings and for permitting him to attend the proceedings through video conferencing.

2. Primarily, the reasons set out by the respondent in the present applica

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top