SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(IND)(DEL) 6209

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Amit Mahajan, J
H – Appellant
Versus
STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI – Respondent
CRL.REV.P. 907/2023 & CRL.M.A. 30857/2023



Advocates:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Akhilesh Pandey, Adv.
For the Respondents: Mr. Raj Kumar, APP for the State. SI Akash Kumar, PS Bhajanpura. Mr. Naveen Single, Mr. Prashant Mahadev, Mr. Yogesh Grover, Advs. for R Nos. 2-6 through V.C.

Acts of cruelty and sexual assault may be interconnected, allowing jurisdiction where the victim takes refuge post-marriage, reinforcing that psychological impacts persist beyond the matrimonial home.

Headnote:(A) Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Sections 397/401/482 - Jurisdiction - High Court reviews discharge of accused from rape charges for lack of territorial jurisdiction - Allegations of continual acts of cruelty and dowry harassment against in-laws considered as interconnected offenses - Court emphasizes continuity in acts constituting a single transaction for jurisdictional intents. (Paras 1, 20, 29, 34)

(B) Jurisdiction - High Court outlines factors in determining continuity of action and commonality of purpose necessary for establishing jurisdiction over discharge of accused in rape cases. (Paras 21, 28)

(C) Findings of Court - Discharge of Respondent Nos. 3 & 5 overturned; matter referred back for fresh consideration on merits, reiterating understanding of cruelty’s psychological impact travelled beyond matrimonial home. (Paras 30, 33, 39)

Facts of the case:
Petitioner’s allegations of marital cruelty culminate in rape accusations against in-laws; complaints registered in jurisdiction aligned with protective measures post-marriage.

Findings of Court:
Rape and cruelty not separable; jurisdiction properly invoked under IPC provisions.

Issues: Jurisdictional questions regarding complaints filed post-marriage in separate locality and conceptualization of continuous acts.

Ratio Decidendi: Court affirms interconnectedness of acts under Section 498A and asserts that allegations of physical and psychological harm warrant examination at one trial.

Result: Impugned order set aside, remand for merits assessment mandated.

Table of Content
1. scope of crpc application and charge reframing. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. confluence of jurisdictional understanding based on continuous acts. (Para 20 , 21)
3. interconnectedness of acts constituting basis for composite charge. (Para 28 , 29 , 30)

JUDGMENT

1. The present petition was filed under Sections 3 97 /401 read with Section 4 82 of the Code of Criminal Procedure , 1973 (‘CrPC’) for setting aside the order dated 28.04.2023 (hereafter ‘impugned order’) passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge (‘ASJ’), East, Karkardooma Courts in SC No. 750/2021 arising out of FIR No. 184/2021 registered at Police Station Bhajan Pura for offences under Sections 4 98A /406/376/34 of the Indian Penal Code , 1860 (‘IPC’) and Sections 3 /4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act , 1961 (‘DP Act’).

2. Succinctly stated, the marriage between the petitioner and Respondent No.2 was solemnized on 20.01.2020, thereafter she started living in her matrimonial home in Jhajjar, Haryana, where the alleged offences took place. The present FIR was registered in Delhi, where the petitioner has been residing with her parents, after leaving her matrimonial home. The relevant extracts of the FIR have been reproduced herein below:

“...On 20-01-2020, I got married with Kartik Drall S/o Sh. Bhagwan Drall R/o House no.292/2011 Dayanand Nagar Bahadurgarh Jhajjar…

…My husband and my father in-law had taken me to their house after the marriage. But they were not happy with me from the very beginning. They were taunting me for bringing the less and below standard dowry items. My life became hell…

…In March 2020, two months after my marriage, I got the information from the friends of my husband that Kartik was already married and he was having a son of seven years old. My marriage with him was his third marriage. I got huge shocked to know that Kartik did not get divorce from his first wife…

…My mother Inlaw, father In- law and sister In-law got removed my jewelry force fully and retain it with them in their possession. Whenever, I asked my Jewelry, they clearly refused to give and those jewelry were kept by my mother in law and sister in law in their possession. Thereafter my In-laws behaved cruelly with me. My In-laws started extending mental and physical cruelty upon me. They stopped giving me food. Some time, they give food to me in the morning, sometime in the evening. My husband and my mother In-law thrashed me many times on the instigation of my sister in law…

…On 27/11/2023 my husband picked severe fight with me and asked me to tell my mother Kirshna Devi to transfer the house situated at Bahadurgarh in the name of Kartik. I objected the same, on that Kartik started thrashing me. He started putting pressure upon me to bring 20 lakh rupees from my parents and told that 20 lakh rupees was needed to secure Government job. When I refused to accept anything like that, my mother In law, sister In-law and husband collectively used abusing language against me and thrashed me...

…My husband never made physical relation with me. My husband forced me to eat cake and pastries and after eating the same, I use to become unconscious/semi-conscious. Thereafter, my father In-law (Bhagwan Drall) and brother In- law (Manjeet) raped me.After gaining my consciousness, I told this to my mother In- law, husband and sister In-law. On that they thrashed me and threatened me that if I wish to remain in their house. I have to bear all that I and they further threatened me that if I tell this to any one, they will kill me. I got so scared that I could not tell that to anybody. The wrong act has been done to me many times. Due to this, I came into the grip of vaginal infection. My In-laws did not take me to any Doctor and my situation deteriorated day by day. On 28/03/2020 my health was deteriorated severely. On that my father In -law left me to my parents' house. Since then, I have been living in my mother's house. I got treatment from Delhi Nursing Home and Janakpuri Godiya women Hosp

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top