Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI, J
SHRI SATYA NARAIN, SINCE DECEASED THROUGH LRS – Appellant
Versus
CHAIRMAN DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN & ANR. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction of appeals and parties' claims. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. appellant's claims on title and possession. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 10) |
| 3. responses and claims by dda. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 4. court analysis of remand and evidence requirements. (Para 22 , 24 , 26 , 28 , 29 , 30) |
| 5. interpretation of settled possession and title requirements. (Para 36 , 38 , 44 , 46) |
| 6. conclusion and dismissal of appeals. (Para 51 , 52 , 53) |
JUDGMENT
ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI J.
By way of the present cross-appeals, the contesting parties–Satya Narain (through his legal representatives) and the Delhi Development Authority („ DDA ‟) – have challenged/sought modification of judgment dated 24.12.2020 passed by the Additional District Judge-07, Central District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi in RCA No.03/2019, by which the learned first appellate court was pleased to remand the matter for consideration by the learned trial court. The rival parties have asserted their title and possession over the suit land; and have sought protection against dispossession from the suit land at the hands of the opposing party.
SUBMISSIONS ON BEHALF OF THE APPELLANT– SATYA NARAIN IN RSA 42/2021
2. On behal
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
