Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
ANIL KSHETARPAL, HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR, JJ
SANDEEP SETHI – Appellant
Versus
RAJINDER KUMAR SETHI DECEASED THROUGH LRS – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. plaintiff's ownership established via legal documentation. (Para 1 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. arguments presented by both parties regarding ownership claims. (Para 17 , 18) |
| 3. court analysis and rejection of the defendants' claims. (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 34 , 36) |
| 4. court's decision and reasoning in favor of the plaintiff. (Para 39 , 40) |
| 5. final dismissal of appeals by the court. (Para 41) |
JUDGMENT
ANIL KSHETARPAL, J.
1. Through the present Appeals, the Appellants [Defendants before the learned Single Judge] in RFA (OS) No. 05/2017 and in RFA (OS) No. 10/2017, and the Appellant [Plaintiff before the learned Single Judge] in RFA (OS) No. 06/2017, assail the correctness of the common judgement dated 28.11.2016 [hereinafter referred to as „Impugned Judgement‟] passed by the learned Single Judge [hereinafter referred to as „LSJ‟] in CS(OS) 2134/2006 & CC No. 990/2017, wherein the Plaintiff‟s suit was decreed against the Defendants in the said suit, directing the Defendants to handover the possession of the entire first floor and two rooms along with one bathroom on the second floor of the Property bearing No. A-8, Vishal Enclave, New D
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
