Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
NAVIN CHAWLA, MADHU JAIN, JJ
UNION OF INDIA – Appellant
Versus
SHRI RAJ PRIY SINGH – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. clarification of respondent's preferences in cadre allocation. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 19 , 20) |
| 2. interpretation and criteria for insider candidate status. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 3. analysis of the tribunal’s interpretation of the cadre allocation policy. (Para 18 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 28 , 30 , 32) |
| 4. establishment of no vested right to a particular cadre. (Para 27 , 29 , 31) |
| 5. conclusion: tribunal's order set aside. (Para 34) |
JUDGMENT
NAVIN CHAWLA, J.
1. This petition has been filed by the petitioner challenging the Order dated 11.02.2014 passed by the learned Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the, ‘Tribunal’) in O.A. No. 1517/2012, titled Sh. Raj Priy Singh v. Union of India, by which the learned Tribunal had been pleased to allow the O.A. filed by the respondent herein with the following directions:
“20. In the totality of facts and circumstances of the case, we dispose of the instant OriginalnApplication with the following directions:
(i) The impugned order dated 26.12.2011 is quashed and set aside;
(ii) The respondent is directed to consider the case of the applicant for allocation
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
