Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
VIVEK RAHEJA – Appellant
Versus
INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY BOARD OF INDIA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge against suspension of registration. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 2. arguments from the appellant and respondent. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 3. judicial review under article 226 limitations. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 4. appeal dismissed for lack of merit. (Para 26) |
JUDGMENT
TEJAS KARIA, J
1. The present Appeal challenges the judgment dated 07.08.2024 passed in W.P.(C) 2894/2024 (“Writ Petition”) and order dated 07.10.2024 passed in Review Petition No. 370/2024 (“Review Petition”) (collectively “Impugned Judgment”).
2. The Writ Petition was filed by the Appellant for quashing and setting aside the order dated 12.01.2024 (“Order”) passed by the Respondent, whereby the Appellant’s registration to practice as Insolvency Professional has been suspended for a period of two years effective 12.02.2024.
3. Vide the Impugned Judgment, the Writ Petition was dismissed by the learned Single Judge by upholding the Order on the ground that the determination made by the Respondent that the Appellant had contravened the provisions of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (“Code”) and its Regulations, and observing that as the Order was
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
