* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

% Judgment delivered on: 09.01.2026

+ C.A.(COMM.IPD-TM) 15/2025

KAPIL GOYAL .....Appellant

Versus

THE REGISTRAR OF TRADE MARKS .....Respondent

Advocates who appeared in this case

For the Appellant : Mr. Sandeep Narula, Mr. Rehan Narula &

Mr. Deepanshu Singh, Advocates.

For the Respondent : Ms. Nidhi Raman, Mr. Arnav Mittal, Mr.

Mayank Sansanwal & Mr. Om Ram,

Advocates. CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TEJAS KARIA

JUDGMENT

TEJAS KARIA, J

1. This is an Appeal filed by the Appellant under Section 91 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 (“Act”) and Rule 156 of the Trade Marks Rules, 2017 (“Rules”) read with the Delhi High Court Intellectual Property Rights Division Rules, 2022, seeking setting aside of the order dated 24.01.2025 (“Impugned Order”) passed by the learned Senior Examiner of Trade Marks refusing registration of the Trade Mark “DOUBLE-CHOICE”

(“Appellant’s Mark”) bearing Application No. 5987240 in Class 30.

FACTUALBACKGROUND:

2. The Appellant is engaged in the business of trading of rice, flour and preparations made from cereals. On 20.06.2023, the Appellant filed an Application bearing No. 5987240 for the registration of the Appellant’s Mark on a proposed-to-be-