Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
TEJAS KARIA, J
NADEEM MAJID OOMERBHOY – Appellant
Versus
SH. GAUTAM TANK & ORS. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. infringement and ownership of the trade mark 'postman'. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 2. history of usage and registration of 'postman' trade mark. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 3. procedural history outlining litigation journey. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27) |
| 4. plaintiffs' claims regarding 'postman' trade mark and evidence. (Para 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55) |
| 5. defendants' defense asserting abandonment of 'postman' mark. (Para 73 , 74 , 75 , 76 , 77 , 78 , 79 , 80) |
| 6. key findings on trademark ownership and validation. (Para 93 , 94 , 95 , 96 , 97 , 98 , 99) |
| 7. infringement of plaintiff no.1's mark and artistic work. (Para 125 , 126 , 127 , 128) |
| 8. final conclusions on the judgment and directives. (Para 158 , 159 , 160) |
JUDGMENT
TEJAS KARIA, J
FACTUAL BACKGROUND:
1. This Suit is filed seeking permanent injunction restraining infringement of Trade Mark ‘POSTMAN’ of Plaintiff No. 1, passing off, damages, rendition of accounts, delivery up, costs etc. The Suit was originally filed by Plaintiff No. 2 in his capacity as the Court Receiver of Plaintiff No.1, a partnership firm being M/s Ahmed Oomerbhoy, vide
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
