SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Del) 32

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
BADAL @PRINCE MALHOTRA – Appellant
Versus
STATE (NCT OF DELHI) – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

% Judgment reserved on :10.10.2025

Judgment pronounced on: 09.01.2026

+ CRL.A. 240/2023 & CRL.M.(BAIL) 375/2023

BADAL @ PRINCE MALHOTRA ..... Appellant

versus

STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent

Advocates who appeared in this case:

For the Appellant : Mr. Saurabh Upadhyay, Mr. Aakash

Yadav, Mr. Salil Dixit and Mr. Amit

Upadhyay, Advocates.

For the Respondent :Mr. Sunil Kumar Gautam, APP for the State

with SI Asha, PS Sarita Vihar.

Mr. Asheesh Jain, Senior Advocate (Amicus Curiae) with Mr. Adarsh Kumar Gupta, Mr. Vishal Gupta and Ms. Neha Yadav,

Advocates.

CORAM

HON’BLE MR JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJAN

JUDGMENT

1. The present appeal is filed challenging the judgment of conviction dated 22.09.2022 (hereafter ‘impugned judgment’) and order on sentence dated 29.11.2022 (hereafter ‘impugned order on

sentence’), passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, New Delhi District, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi in SC No. 9503/2016 arising out of FIR No. 322/2016 (‘FIR’), registered at Police Station Sagarpur.

2. By the impugned judgment, the appellant was held convicted for the offences under Section 376(2)(i) of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (‘IPC’) and Section 4 of the Pro

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top