IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Girish Kathpalia, J
Hitender Yadav – Appellant
Versus
State Nct Of Delhi – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. interim bail for medical exigencies of immediate family members. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. conditions for grant of discretionary interim bail. (Para 6 , 7) |
J U D G M E N T (ORAL)
1. The accused/applicant seeks interim bail in case FIR No. 420/2022 of PS Subhash Place for offence under Section 302/307 IPC read with Section 27/30 Arms Act on the ground of surgery of his mother.
2. Learned APP assisted by IO/Inspector Balram files status report, which is accepted across the board, to be scanned and made part of the record.
3. Learned senior counsel for accused/applicant contends that this is a fit case to grant at least interim bail for three weeks to the accused/applicant as he has to take care of his ailing mother, who has to undergo some spinal surgery on 15.01.2026 and 16.01.2026. It is further submitted by learned senior counsel that medical documents have already been furnished to the IO, who has verified the same. Learned senior counsel has explained that earlier, the surgery was scheduled for 25.12.2025 as mentioned in paragraph 5 of the application but the same could not be carried out due to medical complications of mother of the accused/applicant.
4. Lear
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.