Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Neena Bansal Krishna, J
Aditya Mohan Nigam – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual history of matrimonial disputes and prior civil/dv proceedings. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 2. arguments for quashing based on mala fide prosecution and lack of ingredients. (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28) |
| 3. definition of section 498a cruelty and analysis of prior evidence in dv act. (Para 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43) |
| 4. evaluation of 498a allegations finding them to be vague and non-constitutive of cruelty. (Para 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59) |
| 5. impact of concurrent civil findings and abuse of process on criminal proceedings. (Para 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 68) |
| 6. failure to prove ingredients of section 406 ipc regarding entrustment of stridhan. (Para 69 , 70 , 71 , 72 , 73 , 74 , 75 , 76 , 77 , 78 , 79 , 80 , 81) |
| 7. final determination of abuse of process and quashing of fir. (Para 82 , 83 , 84 , 85 , 86 , 87 , 88) |
J U D G M E N T
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J.
1. Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
