* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

Reserved on:27.11.2025

Pronounced on:07.01.2026

+ W.P.(C) 6577/2019

GHANSHYAM DAS .....Petitioner

Through: Mr. Praveen Nagar, Mr. Amit

Kumar Verma, Mr. Shalab

Agarwal, Advs.

versus

UNION OF INDIA & ANR. .....Respondents

Through: Mr. R.V. Sinha, Mr. A.S. Singh,

Ms. Shirya Sharma, Mr. Moti Garg, Advs. for UPSC with Ms. Chawng Lien Mawi, Under

Secretary

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MADHU JAIN

J U D G M E N T

MADHU JAIN, J.

1. This petition has been filed, challenging the Order dated 03.12.2018 passed by the learned Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Tribunal’) in O.A. No. 4238/2015, titled as Prof. Ghanshyam Das v. Union Public Service Commission & Anr., filed by the petitioner herein, whereby the learned Tribunal dismissed the said O.A., with the

following directions:

“5. The selection to the post in question was exclusively through interview. It is not disputed that applicant was eligible to be

considered. However, in the interview he secured only 22 marks. The minimum stipulated for the post, is 50 in the scale of 100, and for reserved category, it was reduced to 40. Sin