SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Del) 102

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
SH. VIMAL GHAI – Appellant
Versus
SH. M. P. SHARMA – Respondent


$~

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Pronounced on: 05.01.2026

+ CRL.M.C. 4782/2024

SH. VIMAL GHAI .....Petitioner

Through: Mr. Satish Kumar, Mr. Ravi

Kumar, Advs.

versus

SH. M. P. SHARMA .....Respondent

Through: Mr. Shubham Gupta, Adv.

CORAM:-

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJA

JUDGMENT

RAVINDER DUDEJA, J.

1. This is a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C, seeking to set aside the impugned order dated 10.05.2024, passed by the learned Principal District and Sessions Judge in Criminal Revision Petition bearing No. 142/2024, with prayer to allow the petitioner’s application under Section 311 Cr.P.C for re-examination of the respondent/ complainant.

FACTUAL MATRIX

2. Respondent/complainant filed a complaint under Section 138/142 Negotiable Instruments Act [“NI Act”], with allegations that cheque issued by the petitioner towards discharge of his liability was dishonoured with remarks, “Payment stopped by Drawer”, vide

cheque return memo dated 30.06.2020. Petitioner did not make payment despite demand notice dated 28.07.2020.

3. Petitioner was summoned by the trial Court and at present, the matter is at the stage of defence evidence.

4. Petitioner filed an application under Section 311 Cr.P.C

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top