IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Girish Kathpalia, J
Vinay Kumar @ Varun Bidhuri @ Binnu – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of interim bail application and grounds. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. parties' conflicting contentions regarding medical and financial exigencies. (Para 3 , 4 , 7) |
| 3. adjudication refusing interim bail based on trial integrity and gravity of offense. (Para 5 , 6 , 8) |
J U D G M E N T (ORAL)
1. The accused/applicant seeks grant of interim bail in case FIR No. 286/2023 of PS Govind Puri for offence under Section 302/34 IPC & 25/27/54/59 Arms Act.
2. The only ground on which interim bail for a period of 8 weeks is sought by the accused/applicant is the illness of his wife, for which earlier he was granted interim bail repeatedly by the learned trial court.
3. On behalf of accused/applicant, it is contended by learned counsel that wife of the accused/applicant underwent a spinal surgery due to which she developed Parkinson’s disease and there is nobody in the family to take care of her. It is also contended that the accused/applicant needs to come out of jail to make financial arrangements for medical treatment and arranging caretaker for his wife. No other argument has been advanced.
4. On the other hand learned prosecutor strongly opposes the application taking me through
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.