Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Neena Bansal Krishna, J
Central Bureau Of Investigation – Appellant
Versus
Kulwant Rai – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of procedural history and factual background regarding ficn seizure. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 2. arguments for overturning acquittal based on evidence act and section 108 of customs act. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25) |
| 3. defence rebuttal regarding the validity of the impugned judgment. (Para 26 , 27) |
| 4. analysis of consistent ocular testimony and recorded statements regarding recovery. (Para 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38) |
| 5. admissibility and evidentiary value of statements recorded under section 108 of the customs act. (Para 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45) |
| 6. verification of chain of custody and explanation of clerical discrepancies in seized items. (Para 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 68) |
| 7. final determination of guilt under section 489c ipc and acquittal regarding section 489b ipc. (Para 69 , 70 , 71 , 72 , 73 , 74) |
J U D G M E N T
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J.
1. Criminal Appeal under Section 378(2)(b) of Cr.P.C., has been filed on behalf of the Appellant/CBI, against the Impugned Judgment
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
