IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
MAMTA DAS – Appellant
Versus
PUNEET DAS – Respondent
MAT.APP.(F.C.)-160/2022
##PAGE1##
$~
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
% Judgment reserved on:18.12.2025
Judgment pronounced on:24.12.2025
+ MAT.APP.(F.C.) 160/2022
MAMTA DAS .....Appellant
Through: Mr. Zishan A. Siddiqui and Ms.
Amisha Upadhyay, Advocates.
versus
PUNEET DAS .....Respondent
Through: None.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHAN
SHANKAR
J U D G M E N T
HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR, J.
REVIEW PET. 624/2025 (Seeking review in judgment dt. 22.09.2025 filed by
Petitioner) CM APPL. 78637/2025 (Stay) & CM APPL. 78638/2025 (Delay of
2 days in Re-filing the review petition)
1. The present Review Petition instituted under Article 227 of the
Constitution of India, 1950, read with Section 114 and Order XLVII
of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeks review of the final
Judgment dated 22.09.2025, Impugned Judgement passed by this Court in MAT.APP.
(F.C.) No. 160/2022, whereby this Court affirmed the Judgement and
Decree dated 31.05.2022 passed by the learned Principal Judge,
Signature Not VeriMfieAdT.APP.(F.C.) 160/2022 Page 1 of 6
By:HARVINDER KAUR
BHATIA
Signing Date:24.12.2025
11:59:09
##PAGE2##Family Court, Tis Hazari Courts (Central), Delhi, in IDA No.
13/2017, granting a decree of divorce in favour of the Respondent-
husband on the ground of desertion under Section 10(1)(ix) of the
Indian Divorce Act, 1869.
2. During the course of arguments in the Review Petition, learned
counsel appearing for the Appellant-wife contended that Paragraph
50(c) of the Impugned Judgment suffers from a material error
apparent on the face of the record. In order to examine the said
submission, we consider it appropriate to reproduce Paragraph 50(c)
of the Impugned Judgment, which reads as follows:
“50. Upon a scrutiny of the pleadings, depositions, and documents
placed on record, the learned Family Court, arrived at the
following, though not exhaustive, material conclusions:
*****
(c) After 2013-2014, all forms of communication between the
parties came to an end. Importantly, the Wife moved to Doha in
November 2012 without even informing the Husband, while the
Husband relocated to Nigeria in December 2012. The parties
thereafter lived abroad in different countries and never reunited
under one roof.
*****
….”
3. It was contended that while the said paragraph records that the
Appellant-wife left for Doha without informing the husband, the
admitted factual position, as borne out from the record, is that the
Petitioner-wife had relocated to Doha in November 2012 after duly
informing the Respondent-husband. In support of this submission,
reliance is placed on the e-mail communications dated 28.09.2012,
03.10.2012, and 11.10.2012.
4. Having considered the submission advanced on behalf of the
Appellant-wife, we concur that the factual aspect highlighted by her,
Signature Not VeriMfieAdT.APP.(F.C.) 160/2022 Page 2 of 6
Digitally Signed
By:HARVINDER KAUR
BHATIA
Signing Date:24.12.2025
11:59:09
##PAGE3##namely, that she had informed the Respondent-husband prior to
relocating to Doha, stands clarified from the e-mail communications
placed on record.
5. However, in our considered opinion, the factual correction
sought by the Appellant-wife, even if accepted in her favour, does not
materially alter, dilute, or undermine the overall appreciation of
evidence on record. Nor does it have any meaningful bearing on the
ultimate finding of desertion as recorded by the learned Family Court
or reaffirmed by this Court in its Judgment dated 22.09.2025. The
finding of desertion is not predicated upon any isolated or minute
factual detail, but rather rests upon an evaluation of the cumulative
conduct of the parties and the totality of circumstances duly
established on record. A correction confined to a marginal factual
aspect, therefore, cannot dislodge or unsettle the final conclusions
arrived at in the said Judgments.
6. While rendering the Judgment under review, all material
aspects, pleadings, evidence, and surrounding circumstances were
examined and considered in extensive detail. During the c
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.