SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Del) 46225

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
DARSHANA RANI AND ORS – Appellant
Versus
JANAK RAJ HANDA AND ORS – Respondent
CM(M)-2501/2025



##PAGE1##

$~10

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

% Date of Decision: 24.12.2025

+ CM(M) 2501/2025, CM APPL. 82055/2025 & 82054/2025

DARSHANA RANI AND ORS .....Petitioners

Through: Mr. Manu Parashar, Advocate

versus

JANAK RAJ HANDA AND ORS .....Respondents

Through: None

CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA

O R D E R (ORAL)

1. Petitioners have assailed order dated 19.11.2025 of the learned trial

court and have sought directions to the trial court to decide their application

which is stated to have been filed in terms of order dated 15.10.2025 and

permit them to demarcate and separate their one fourth share by metes and

bounds only by erecting wall in the middle of the remaining half portion of

the suit property. Having heard learned counsel for petitioners, I find the

petition completely frivolous and not fit for issuance of even notice.

2. For convenience, order dated 15.10.2025 of the learned trial court is

extracted below:

15th October, 2025

Present: Sh. Rahul Kapoor, Proxy Counsel for plaintiff.

CM(M) 2501/2025 Page 1 of 3 pages

D BSi yig g :Nin taa Elt l Eu y Tr Se Ui g N Nno e Ndt AV Ie Rrified G KAIR TI HSH P ALIADD29Cps9cDe n.a oOiN a5 rg f =6s ti. U3:4 ai et bGtc 9 aR l. :a 42 N = I6 l 2T Rl C 00I 2 u

0

y IN foO= Sc m 28 s, d H86F 50io beg 4f .cDb K= 1=e0n bA4 2EH r1 1e d=8 .L Td 2Id 2G H3 d H0d

4

eb 5 3H I P8 , 1dy C e A4C 4 8I3G 9 6LD :O 3 6 2,b I0I A5 7R s 6U -2 4tf 9I :7R =7 0 4S 9 60H a 2T 97 D447 c 6 O -e5K 7 4 02 l1AF 6 8hb 86 e 3 7T i '2cD 0,c 8 9H af 4E6 ,c 6P 5L '5 5AH caf f0L ,I , 87I o A e 0bu4 15=a edHf 2e 1I 6cG 5f4 aH5 7, 06

Signing Date:24.12.2025

15:15:42

##PAGE2##

Sh. Manu Parashar, ld. Counsel for D-1.

Sh. Anukul Adhana, ld. Counsel for D-3(a, b, c and d).

Sh. Sarthak Handa, Ms. Somya Handa, both LRs of Sh.

Surinder Pal Handa in person.

Sh. Shyam Sunder Handa in person.

Fresh vakalatnama filed on behalf of D-3(a, b, c and d). Same

is taken on record.

At joint request, list the matter for further proceedings/final

decree for 19.11.2025.

Parties are at liberty to file proposals to divide the suit

property by metes and bounds, positively by NDOH.”

3. The order impugned in the present proceedings is extracted below:

19th October, 2025

Present: Sh. Rahul Kapoor, Proxy Counsel for plaintiff through V.C.

Sh. Manu Parashar, ld. Counsel for D-l.

D-2 Shyam Sunder Handa in person.

Sh. Hemant Kakkar, Proxy Counsel for LR of Surender

Handa

Sh. Hemant Chaudhary, ld. Counsel for D-6.

Parties seek some more time for amicable settlement.

One last and final opportunity is granted to the parties to settle

the matter amicably or file proposal to divide the suit property by

metes and bounds, in terms of preliminary decree positively by

NDOH.

List the matter for further proceedings on 24.12.2025.

Date is given as per request and convenience of parties.”

4. The very perusal of these two orders shows that there is no infirmity,

much less any perversity in the said two orders including the impugned

order that would call for an interference under Article 227 of the

Constitution of India. Both orders are simply procedural orders. There is

nothing on record to suggest that the application, if any, filed by the present

petitioners would not be considered by the learned trial court.

CM(M) 2501/2025 Page 2 of 3 pages

D BSi yig g :Nin taa Elt l Eu y Tr Se Ui g N Nno e Ndt AV Ie Rrified G KAIR TI HSH P ALIADD25ops52De.5 76uoiN a5 rg 6 0f=s ti. a:4 ai et 9 9t Hc ,al.

:

a a 92 N = clI 2l f C 6G n0I 3 u 0yN bo= =H9 m

2

4s, d8 G6 5i Co 0beg 42 .I= 1fO R=e0n c 8 2IH r16 1Ue 0S= .df 1 2Id HcRbG d0d 4b T b 4 3H K0 8 d 18y O e A0 8 2 4C 3 83G F9 Te :O 5 6 2, HbI Dd 7R s 6U2 PtE4 9I :R =7 6 3S AL3 6H a 0T 6DH L5 47 4 IO -ef 5IK A7 0 09,lC 1AF hb 2 87 eI T i c '26DD 0,c 4H f2 4 E 06 - 86P 5L '5 7 7cAH cf 0 9a 0LI 4c 6, 7I A 7 5e ba64 f 5,3a 8df 8 0e 1, 1 c 5e4

Signing Date:24.12.2025

15:15:42

##PAGE3##

5. Therefore, the petition and accompanying applications are dismissed.

Digitaly signed by GIRISH KATHPALIA

GIRISH D 2.N 5.: 4 c .2= 0IN =, 8 o 4= 0H 1dIG dH 8 8C 9O bU 2R 7aT 7 O 7F b 2D fE 6L 5H ffI f, f e4

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top