IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
RAMESH CHANDER SHARMA – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS – Respondent
W.P.(C)-479/2022
##PAGE1##
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Reserved on:26.11.2025
Pronounced on: 24.12.2025
+ W.P.(C) 479/2022
RAMESH CHANDER SHARMA .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. S.N. Kaul, Adv.
versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS . …..Respondents
Through: Mr.Vikrant N. Goyal, Mr.
Kunal Dixit, Mr. Harsh Kr.
Singh, Mr. Piyush Wadhwa,
Advs.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MADHU JAIN
J U D G M E N T
MADHU JAIN, J.
1. This petition has been filed challenging the Order dated
04.03.2020 passed by the learned Central Administrative Tribunal,
Principal Bench, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Tribunal’)
in O.A. No. 2728/2014, titled Ramesh Chander Sharma v. Union of
India & Ors., whereby the learned Tribunal disposed of the said O.A.
filed by the petitioner herein, with the following directions:
“12. We, therefore, partly allow the OA
holding that the applicant is entitled to the
upgradation to the Grade Pay of Rs. 5400/- on
completion of four years of service in the
Grade Pay of Rs. 4800/-. However, in view of
the delay in approaching the Tribunal for
Signature Not Verified
Signed By:RENUKAW.P.(C) 479/2022 Page1of16
NEGI
Signing Date:24.12.2025
15:46:24
##PAGE2##pursuing the claim, we deny him the arrears
and the benefit shall be reflected in the form of
last pay drawn, and thereby the revision of
pension. This exercise shall be completed
within a period of three months from the date
of receipt of copy of this order, and the revised
pensionshall bepaidprospectively.
Thereshall benoorder as tocosts.”
BRIEF FACTS OF THE PRESENT CASE:
2. The petitioner joined the Central Industrial Security Force
(CISF), Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India, on
29.03.1971 as a Steno-Typist. He was subsequently promoted to the
post of Stenographer Grade-II on 31.08.1976, and thereafter to the
post of Senior Personal Assistant (Senior PA) on 28.07.1989, in the
pre-revised pay scale of Rs.2000–3500.
3. Under the 5th Central Pay Commission (CPC), the petitioner
was drawing the pay scale of Rs.6500–10500 as Senior PA.
4. The Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) thereafter sanctioned the
upgradation of one post of PS attached to Director General (DG),
CISF, from the pay scale of Rs.6500–10500 to Rs.7500–12000, vide
order dated 21.11.2008, which was implemented in the petitioner’s
case through Notification dated 19.01.2009, granting him upgradation
to the post of PS with effect from 21.11.2008.
5. Pursuant to the Department of Personnel and Training (DoPT)
Office Memorandum dated 11.04.2001, the post of Senior PA held by
the petitioner stood upgraded to the post of Private Secretary (PS).
The said upgradation was formally adopted by the Central Industrial
Security Force (CISF) vide Notification dated 03.06.2010, whereby
Signature Not Verified
Signed By:RENUKAW.P.(C) 479/2022 Page2of16
NEGI
Signing Date:24.12.2025
15:46:24
##PAGE3##the petitioner was granted the benefit of upgradation with effect from
11.04.2001, replacing the earlier operative date of 21.11.2008.
6. Following the implementation of the 6th CPC, the petitioner’s
pay was fixed on 20.01.2011 by respondent no. 3 at the Basic Pay of
Rs.19,530/- plus the Grade Pay of Rs. 4,800/- in the upgraded post of
PS. It is the case of the petitioner that such fixation was contrary to the
applicable rules governing revision of pay on completion of four
years’ service in the upgraded post.
7. Aggrieved thereby, the petitioner submitted a detailed
representation dated 27.01.2011, seeking, inter alia, (i) placement in
the pre-revised pay scale of Rs.8000–13500 upon completion of four
years of service as PS with effect from 11.04.2005, and; (ii) re-
fixation of his pay under the 6th CPC with effect from 01.01.2006 in
Pay Band-2 (Rs.9300–34800) with Grade Pay of Rs. 5400/-, in terms
of the Ministry of Finance Notification dated 29.08.2008.
8. The petitioner submitted further reminders dated 21.02.2011,
29.02.2012, and 15.07.2013. However, his representations remained
unaddressed.
9. The petitioner superannuated on 31.03.2011. Even thereafter, he
continued to pursue his c
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.