IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
M/S BANWARI LAL CHARITABLE TRUST & ORS. – Appellant
Versus
ATUL JAIN & ORS. – Respondent
CM(M)-961/2022
##PAGE1##
$~12
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
% Date of Decision: 23.12.2025
+ CM(M) 961/2022 & CM APPL. 40343/2022
M/S BANWARI LAL CHARITABLE TRUST & ORS.
.....Petitioners
Through: Mr. Satya Prakash Sharan, Advocate.
versus
ATUL JAIN & ORS. .....Respondents
Through: Mr. Sanjeet Singh, Advocate.
CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA
O R D E R (ORAL)
1. Petitioners/judgment debtors have assailed order dated 22.04.2022 of
the learned execution court, whereby application under Section 151 CPC
filed on behalf of petitioners/judgment debtors for appointment of Local
Commissioner for the purposes of demarcation of the subject property was
dismissed because there was no need for the exercise, going by the site plan
filed by the petitioners/judgment debtors themselves before the execution
court.
2. I have heard learned counsel for both sides and examined the record.
3. Broadly speaking, it appears that the present petitioners sold property
CM(M) 961/2022 Page 1 of 5 pages
D BSi yig g :Nin taa Elt l Eu y Tr Se Ui g N Nno e Ndt AV Ie Rrified G KAIR TI HSH P ALIADD2ea7s1fD8e,c. 0 5iN a 5 0rg o4 4 ti. 1:4 u ai 5 e 7 7tc el. :=a 6 02 N = 226l 3 9H0I u 60y 9N 8= I fm 2 Ga , 6as,8 5f pio b,H b3g 4 .co= 14 e90n C ns 20H r61e t =O = .f2d a 2Id 8G GdUlcd 3 0Cb 3H 6 IR 8 cR1oy ef T bIb 8C d 8 SG 9 d :O4O e6 H0bI 28 =7R F 7U 2 eK3 9 I 1 :DR7 5S 5 A6H aT 6dE T407 6 L 4O H-5K 0 0H3 1 PAFb 4 85I e3 A,T 0 '2D Cf 0c,H 9 L 2f 4IsE6 ID7 cP t A5L '5 = 46 AH c -f 82 D0LI 76, 7eI A 9ec blha4 6 5c ia 5,d f f
Signing Date:23.12.2025
18:11:02
##PAGE2##bearing no.1/16 and 1/17, Rani Jhansi Road, New Delhi but subsequently
filed a suit for declaration and cancellation of the sale documents pertaining
to premises bearing no.1/17, Rani Jhansi Road, New Delhi, apart from other
reliefs. In the course of that suit, parties arrived at a settlement dated
17.09.2007, on the basis of which a compromise decree was passed. In the
course of execution of that compromise decree, the petitioners/judgment
debtors filed an application seeking appointment of Local Commissioner in
order to carry out demarcation of the subject property, which application
was dismissed by the learned execution court going by the site plan filed by
the petitioners/judgment debtors themselves. Hence, the present petition.
4. Learned counsel for petitioners/judgment debtors contends that the
impugned order is not sustainable in the eyes of law because identity of the
subject property is of crucial issue. Learned counsel for petitioners/judgment
debtors has taken me through paragraph no. 8 of the settlement dated
17.09.2007, submitting that a portion of premises bearing no.1/16, Rani
Jhansi Road, New Delhi is occupied by the tenant who had been inducted in
premises bearing no.1/15 and both premises being adjacent to each other,
there is a need for clear demarcation. It is argued that in case the
respondents/decree holders are given possession of the entire premises
bearing no.1/16, they would get possession of a portion of premises no.1/15
as well and consequently, the premises bearing no.1/15 shall not be
converted into freehold. Learned counsel for petitioners/judgment debtors
also contends that the sale deed in favour of the respondents/decree holders
specifically excludes the portion of premises bearing no.1/15, which was in
CM(M) 961/2022 Page 2 of 5 pages
Signature Not Verified
D Byig :Nita Ell Ey
T
S Uig Nne Nd
AIR
G KAIR TI HSH P ALIADD29Cps9cDe n.a 6oOiN a5 rg f =bs ti. U3:4 ai et 4Gtc 9 aR l. :a 02 N = I6 l 2T Rl C f0I 2 u 08 y IN oO= Sc m 20 s, d H86F 5cio beg 4f b .Db K= 1=e0n dA4 2EH r1 1e 2=8 .L Td 2Id eG H3 d H0
3
b 5 3H I P8 , 1dy C e A6 8C 4 8I3G 9 0LD :O 3 6 0,b I4I A5 7R s 7U -2 0tf 9I :7R =7 2 4S 9 60H a cT 57 D44 47 6 O -e5K 7 8 02 l1AF 6 7hb 86 e 3 9T i '2cD 0,c8 6H af 4E6 ,c 5P 5L '5 fAH caf 80L ,I , 07I o A e 1bu4 e5=a 2dHf 6e 1I fcG 5a4 ,H 5 7 06 9
Signing Date:23.12.2025
18:11:02
##PAGE3##occupation of the tenant.
5. On the other hand, learned counsel for respondents/decree holders
strongly supports the impugned order, taking me
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.