$~

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

Judgment reserved on: 05.08.2025

Judgment pronounced on: 22.12.2025

+ FAO (COMM) 15/2024 & CM APPL. 46503/2025

DINDAYAL INDUSTRIES LTD. .....Appellant

Through: Ms. Rajeshwari H. and Ms.

Nupur A. Goswami, Advs.

versus

DINDAYAL AYURVED

BHAWAN. & ANR .....Respondents

Through: Mr. Suhail Sehgal, Mr. Prashant Drolia, Mr. Lakshay Singh, Mr. Ronald Raj

Datt, Mr. Akash Jiangra, Advs.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE OM PRAKASH SHUKLA

JUDGMENT

% 22.12.2025

OM PRAKASH SHUKLA, J.

INTRODUCTION

1. The appellant has preferred the present appeal under Section 13 of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 read with Order XLIII Rule 1(r) of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908¹, challenging the impugned order dated 18.09.2023 passed by the learned District Judge (Commercial Court-03), South East district, Saket Courts, Delhi, whereby the

application filed by the appellant under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 of the CPC seeking interim injunction was dismissed.

2. For the sake of convenience, the parties to the present appeal would be referred to by the same status and name as they have been referred to as before the learned District Judge. Thus, the “appellant” wo