IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
SANJIV NARULA – Appellant
Versus
PARGAT SINGH AND ANR – Respondent
$~4
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
% Date of Decision: 20.12.2025
+ CM(M) 2448/2025
SANJIV NARULA .....Petitioner
Through: Dr. Shashi Kiran, Senior Advocate
with Mr. Nikhil Kumar Sharma and
Ms. Jashmine Minj, Advocates
versus
PARGAT SINGH AND ANR .....Respondents
Through: None.
CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA
O R D E R (ORAL)
1. Petitioner/plaintiff has assailed order dated 17.09.2025 of the learned trial court, whereby his application under Order VII Rule 14(3) CPC and Order XVI Rule 1(3) CPC read with Section 151 CPC (moved subsequent to part hearing of final arguments) was dismissed. Having heard learned senior counsel for petitioner at length, I do not find it a fit case to even issue notice. Rather, the present petition is found to be completely frivolous and filed with oblique purposes to somehow delay disposal of the subject suit,
which is pending since the year 2012.
2. Broadly speaking, the circumstances relevant for present purposes are that in the subject suit filed by the petitioner/plaintiff for recovery of CM(M) 2448/2025 Page 1 of 5 pages
Signature Not Verified GIRISH D D 2. i N 5 g . : 4 i t c . a 2 = l 0 I y N = s , 8 i o g 4 = 0 n H 1 e d I d G d b H 8 y 8 C G 9 O b I
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.