SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Del) 46303

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
SANJIV NARULA – Appellant
Versus
PARGAT SINGH AND ANR – Respondent


$~4

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

% Date of Decision: 20.12.2025

+ CM(M) 2448/2025

SANJIV NARULA .....Petitioner

Through: Dr. Shashi Kiran, Senior Advocate

with Mr. Nikhil Kumar Sharma and

Ms. Jashmine Minj, Advocates

versus

PARGAT SINGH AND ANR .....Respondents

Through: None.

CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA

O R D E R (ORAL)

1. Petitioner/plaintiff has assailed order dated 17.09.2025 of the learned trial court, whereby his application under Order VII Rule 14(3) CPC and Order XVI Rule 1(3) CPC read with Section 151 CPC (moved subsequent to part hearing of final arguments) was dismissed. Having heard learned senior counsel for petitioner at length, I do not find it a fit case to even issue notice. Rather, the present petition is found to be completely frivolous and filed with oblique purposes to somehow delay disposal of the subject suit,

which is pending since the year 2012.

2. Broadly speaking, the circumstances relevant for present purposes are that in the subject suit filed by the petitioner/plaintiff for recovery of CM(M) 2448/2025 Page 1 of 5 pages

Signature Not Verified GIRISH D D 2. i N 5 g . : 4 i t c . a 2 = l 0 I y N = s , 8 i o g 4 = 0 n H 1 e d I d G d b H 8 y 8 C G 9 O b I

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top