* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

Reserved on: November 21, 2025

% Pronounced on: December 19, 2025

+ RC.REV. 395/2024

OM PRAKASH .....Petitioner

Through: Mr. Sumit Gaba, Adv.

Versus

DEVKI NANDAN BAJAJ .....Respondent

Through: Mr. Amit Saxena, Mr. Santosh Kr.

Sharma, Mr. Mridul Sharma, Ms. Shalini Mishra and Mr. Vasu Singhal,

Advs.

CORAM:

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE

J U D G M E N T

1. The petitioner/ landlord, Hereinafter “landlord filed an Eviction petition being RC/ ARC 60 of 2019 against the respondent/ tenant, Hereinafter “tenant qua shop no.3 situated in plot No.166, Shyama Prasad Mukherjee Park, Tilak Nagar, New Delhi-110 018, Hereinafter “subject premises under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, Hereinafter “DRC Act, before the learned

Additional Rent Controller, West District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi, Hereinafter “learned ARC

2. Succinctly put, the landlord, father of a married daughter and two unmarried daughters, in his Eviction Petition sought eviction of the tenant

from the subject premises from a property comprising of six shop(s), of which shop nos.4 and 5 were lying vacant and shop nos.1, 2 and 6 were occupied by third parties. As per landlord, h