IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
KUSUM – Appellant
Versus
ASHOK KUMAR MUNNA – Respondent
FAO-2/2025
##PAGE1##
$~27
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
% Date of decision: 19.12.2025
+ FAO 2/2025 and CM APPL. 303/2025
KUSUM .....Appellant
Through: Ms. Sangeeta Chandra and Ms. Nidhi
Garg, Advocates.
versus
ASHOK KUMAR MUNNA .....Respondent
Through: Mr. Kshitij Mathur, Advocate.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE CHANDRASEKHARAN SUDHA
JUDGMENT (ORAL)
CHANDRASEKHARAN SUDHA, J.
1. This appeal under order XLIII Rule 1 (r) of the Code of
Civil Procedure, 1908 (the CPC) has been filed by the plaintiff in
DJ 12/2021 on the file of the Court of Additional District Judge-01
(West), Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi aggrieved by the order dated
04.03.2024, by which three applications filed by the respondent/
defendant, one for review of the order dated 05.04.2022 by which
the application under Order XXXIX Rules 1 & 2 was allowed; two
Signature Not Verified
Signed By:KOMAL FAO 2/2025 Page 1
DHAWAN
Signing Date:22.12.2025
14:33:16
##PAGE2##for modifying the order 05.04.2022 and an application under
section 151 CPC was allowed.
2. In this appeal, unless otherwise specified, the parties will
be referred to as described in the suit.
3. The plaintiff filed the aforesaid suit for declaration,
possession and injunction alleging thus:- The defendant is the
maternal uncle of the plaintiff. The suit property bearing no. F-28,
Karam Pura, Delhi measuring 22 Sq. yards was purchased by the
plaintiff’s mother, namely, Kanta Devi from Luddar, s/o Prabhu
Dayal, R/o - F-28, Karam Pura, New Delhi through General Power
of Attorney dated 12.06.1985. The mother of the plaintiff died on
09.05.2011 leaving behind her husband Om Prakash and her
daughter, the plaintiff herein. The plaintiff’s father passed away on
02.12.2016 leaving behind the plaintiff as the sole legal heir of
Kanta Devi. Thus, the plaintiff became the owner of the suit
property.
3.1. The plaintiff’s mother sometime in the year 2010, let out
Signature Not Verified
Signed By:KOMAL FAO 2/2025 Page 2
DHAWAN
Signing Date:22.12.2025
14:33:16
##PAGE3##one room and a kitchen on the first floor of the aforesaid property
to one tenant for a monthly rent of ₹ 3,000/-. The rent was being
collected by the plaintiff’s mother till her death in April, 2011.
After the demise of the plaintiff’s mother, the rent from May, 2011
was being collected by the defendant claiming to be the owner of
the first floor of the building bearing no. F-28, Karampura, Delhi.
3.2 There are several criminal cases pending against the
defendant in the various courts situated at Delhi. The defendant, a
man of ill-repute is in the habit of illegally grabbing the property
of poor people with the assistance of the local police officials. The
plaintiff had lodged several complaints against the defendant. The
defendant keeps threatening the tenant of the plaintiff residing in
the second floor of the suit property, namely, F-28, Karampura,
Delhi claiming to be the owner of the suit property.
3.3 The cause of action is alleged to have arisen in the year
2011 when it came to the knowledge of the plaintiff that the
defendant was illegally receiving rent from the tenants of the
Signature Not Verified
Signed By:KOMAL FAO 2/2025 Page 3
DHAWAN
Signing Date:22.12.2025
14:33:16
##PAGE4##plaintiff. The cause of action is also stated to have arisen on
13.12.2020, when the plaintiff lodged a police complaint against
the defendant as he was threatening to evict the tenants of the
plaintiff. Hence, the suit.
4. The respondent/defendant entered appearance and filed
written statement denying the allegations in the plaint. It was
contended that the defendant has been in possession of the
property for more than 12 years and hence, the suit was barred by
limitation. The defendant is the absolute owner of the property and
hence, it was contended that the plaintiff, who is relying on false
and fabricated documents is not entitled to the reliefs prayed for.
5. The trial court after hearing both sides as per order dated
04.03.2024 allowed the application by which the defendant and his
agents were restrained from creating any third party interest in
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.