$~1

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

Date of decision: 18.12.2025

+ FAO (COMM) 310/2025

PRIMEMOVER MOBILITY TECHNOLOGIES PVT. LTD.

.....Appellant

Through: Mr. Shreesh Chadha, Mr. Kartik

Bhatnagar, Mr. Aman Singh

Bakhshi, Mr. Shaurya Agarwal,

Mr. Faiz, Advs.

versus

SANMARG INFRA TECH PRIVATE LIMITED

.....Respondent

Through: Mr. Rohit Jain, Adv.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA

NAVIN CHAWLA, J. (ORAL)

1. This appeal has been filed under section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as, the ‘A&C Act’), challenging the Order dated 07.08.2025 passed by the learned District Judge (Commercial Court-01), Patiala House Courts Complex, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as, the ‘District Judge’) in O.M.P.(Comm.) No. 230/2024, titled Primemover Mobility Technologies Pvt. Ltd. v. Sanmarg Infratech Private Limited, whereby the application filed by the appellant herein under section 34

of the A&C Act was dismissed.

2. The Impugned Order has been passed by the learned District Judge on the ground that the appellant, despite time being granted,

failed to file the Fixed Deposit Receipt (‘FDR’) of the mandatory pre- deposit of