SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Del) 46439

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
RAHUL KUMAR AND ANR. – Appellant
Versus
STATE (NCT OF DELHI) – Respondent


$~44

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

% Date of Decision: December 16th, 2025

+ CRL.REV.P. 187/2023 & CRL.M.A. 4674/2023

RAHUL KUMAR AND ANR. .....Petitioners

Through: Mr. Ashish Mundhare,

Advocate.

versus

STATE (NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent

Through: Mr. Sunil Kumar Gautam,

APP for the State with SI

Udit, PS Ranhola.

Mr. Binod K. Aggarwal, Advocate for complainant

(through VC).

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJAN

AMIT MAHAJAN, J. (Oral)

1. The present petition has been filed under section 397of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, (‘CrPC’) assailing of the order dated 10.11.2022 (‘impugned order’), passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge (‘ASJ’), whereby charges for the offences under sections 498A/304B/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (‘IPC’), have been framed against the Petitioners

herein and accused Vipin@Chuha.

2. The Petitioner No. 1/ Sh. Rahul and Petitioner No. 2/Smt. Mithlesh are the brother-in-law and sister, respectively, of the

husband of the deceased/victim namely Vipin @Chuha.

3. Succinctly stated, the FIR no. 102/2020 dated 13.02.2020

was registered at Police Station Ranhola, at the behest of the father of the victim alleging that the deceased/victim-Smt. Jyoti wa

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top