IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
RAHUL KUMAR AND ANR. – Appellant
Versus
STATE (NCT OF DELHI) – Respondent
$~44
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
% Date of Decision: December 16th, 2025
+ CRL.REV.P. 187/2023 & CRL.M.A. 4674/2023
RAHUL KUMAR AND ANR. .....Petitioners
Through: Mr. Ashish Mundhare,
Advocate.
versus
STATE (NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent
Through: Mr. Sunil Kumar Gautam,
APP for the State with SI
Udit, PS Ranhola.
Mr. Binod K. Aggarwal, Advocate for complainant
(through VC).
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJAN
AMIT MAHAJAN, J. (Oral)
1. The present petition has been filed under section 397of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, (‘CrPC’) assailing of the order dated 10.11.2022 (‘impugned order’), passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge (‘ASJ’), whereby charges for the offences under sections 498A/304B/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (‘IPC’), have been framed against the Petitioners
herein and accused Vipin@Chuha.
2. The Petitioner No. 1/ Sh. Rahul and Petitioner No. 2/Smt. Mithlesh are the brother-in-law and sister, respectively, of the
husband of the deceased/victim namely Vipin @Chuha.
3. Succinctly stated, the FIR no. 102/2020 dated 13.02.2020
was registered at Police Station Ranhola, at the behest of the father of the victim alleging that the deceased/victim-Smt. Jyoti wa
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.