SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Del) 46452

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
RAJAN SAREEN – Appellant
Versus
STATE NCT OF DELHI & ORS – Respondent


J U D G M E N T

NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J.

1. Petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as “Cr.P.C.”) has been filed on behalf the Petitioner/Rajan Sareen against Order dated 16.03.2017 of learned Special Judge (PC Act) CBI-01, Delhi in Crl. Revision No.10/2016 upholding the Order of learned MM dated 02.03.2016 qua Respondent Nos.2 to 5 discharging them for the offence under Section 187/211/406/500/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred to as “IPC”). However, the Order dated 02.03.2016, insofar as it related to Respondent No. 2, was partially set aside, and Respondent No. 2 was summoned for the offence punishable under Section 506 IPC.

2. The brief facts of the case are that Petitioner/Rajan Sareen was one of the Directors of M/s Crescore Wealth Management (P) Ltd. and M/s Unor Exim Pvt. Ltd. which are registered under the Companies Act, 1956, having their registered offices at Rajindra Place, New Delhi (both Companies are hereinafter jointly referred to as “the Company”).

3. Respondent No.2/Ms. Sangeeta Nagpal joined the Company on 03.07.2013 as Executive Assistant Administrative and Business. She left the job on

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top