IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
DAMODARA BANGERA B – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. – Respondent
$~80
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ W.P.(C) 11926/2021
DAMODARA BANGERA B .....Petitioner
Through: Ms. Saahila Lamba, Adv.
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents
Through: Mr. Raj Kumar Yadav, SPC with Mr. Jitendra Kumar Tripathi, GP and Mr. Sumit Kumar Raj, Ms. Preeti Gothwal
and Ms. Anjali Ahlawat, Advs.
Mr. Jivesh Kumar Tiwari, CGSC with Ms.
Samiksha, Adv.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE OM PRAKASH SHUKLA
JUDGMENT (ORAL)
% 15.12.2025
C.HARI SHANKAR, J.
1. Consequent to his promotion as Sub Inspector (Ministerial), “SI” hereinafter in the Border Security Force2, the petitioner, admittedly, assumed charge
of the post on 2 July 2000.
2. The order of promotion dated 9 June 2000 specifically stipulated that the promotion would be with immediate effect, but that financial benefits would accrue to the petitioner and other persons promoted by the order from the date of taking over charge of the new
assignment – in the case of the petitioner, of the post of SI.
3. As the petitioner was on sanctioned leave till 1 July 2000, the petitioner assumed charge of the post of SI on 2 July 2000. Accordingly, in terms of the promotion order dated 9 June 2000, the pay of
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.