SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Del) 46468

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
DAMODARA BANGERA B – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. – Respondent


$~80

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(C) 11926/2021

DAMODARA BANGERA B .....Petitioner

Through: Ms. Saahila Lamba, Adv.

versus

UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents

Through: Mr. Raj Kumar Yadav, SPC with Mr. Jitendra Kumar Tripathi, GP and Mr. Sumit Kumar Raj, Ms. Preeti Gothwal

and Ms. Anjali Ahlawat, Advs.

Mr. Jivesh Kumar Tiwari, CGSC with Ms.

Samiksha, Adv.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE OM PRAKASH SHUKLA

JUDGMENT (ORAL)

% 15.12.2025

C.HARI SHANKAR, J.

1. Consequent to his promotion as Sub Inspector (Ministerial), “SI” hereinafter in the Border Security Force2, the petitioner, admittedly, assumed charge

of the post on 2 July 2000.

2. The order of promotion dated 9 June 2000 specifically stipulated that the promotion would be with immediate effect, but that financial benefits would accrue to the petitioner and other persons promoted by the order from the date of taking over charge of the new

assignment – in the case of the petitioner, of the post of SI.

3. As the petitioner was on sanctioned leave till 1 July 2000, the petitioner assumed charge of the post of SI on 2 July 2000. Accordingly, in terms of the promotion order dated 9 June 2000, the pay of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top