$~60

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ FAO(OS) (COMM) 203/2025 & CM APPL. 78491/2025 ANAND TOMAR .....Appellant

Through: Mr. Mukesh M. Goel, Adv.

versus

POOJA ELECTRIC CO. .....Respondent

Through: Mr. Vikas Khera, Ms. Sneha Sethia, Mr. Yash Sharma and Mr. Jatin

Gautam, Advs.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE OM PRAKASH SHUKLA

O R D E R (ORAL)

% 15.12.2025

C.HARI SHANKAR, J.

1. This appeal is directed against order dated 25 September 2025 passed by a learned Single Judge of this Court in IA No. 3702/2025, filed by the respondent, as the plaintiff. The appellant is the defendant

before the learned Single Judge.

2. The impugned order reads thus:

“I.A. 3702/2025 (for amendment of the plaint)

1. This is an application filed on behalf of the plaintiff under Order VI Rule 17 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (‘CPC’), read

with Section 151 CPC, for amendment of the plaint.

2. Learned counsel for the plaintiff states that the issues in this suit have been framed on 18.12.2024. However, subsequently, on 14.01.2025, the plaintiff’s trademark application nos. 2990322,

3382660 and 2990321 were allowed and granted registration.

2.1 She states that the full disclosure of the pend