Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Navin Chawla, Madhu Jain, JJ
Union Of India – Appellant
Versus
Shiv Charan – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. establishing the factual background and the dispute regarding seniority between dpc promotees and ldce appointees in the intelligence bureau. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 2. submission of evidence through affidavits regarding vacancy calculations, quota adherence, and temporary diversion of posts. (Para 23 , 24 , 25) |
| 3. arguments presented by the union of india regarding the regularity of promotions within the promotional quota. (Para 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34) |
| 4. arguments presented by ldce respondents asserting improper diversion of vacancies and violation of seniority principles. (Para 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44) |
| 5. judicial assessment of seniority rules under dop&t guidelines and the validity of promotions when the quota rule breaks down. (Para 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56) |
| 6. analysis of rule relaxation powers; determination that unauthorized diversion of quota vacancies renders appointments ad-hoc. (Para 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67) |
| 7. ratio that failure to strictly comply with mandatory procedure |
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
