Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Jasmeet Singh, J
Sanidhya Subhadarshan – Appellant
Versus
National Testing Agency – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. procedural history and factual background of the case. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 2. assessment of respondent submissions regarding the petitioner's investigation status. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 3. requirement of compelling evidence to justify termination of admission. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. protection of academic progress and fundamental rights to education. (Para 13) |
| 5. issuance of directive to permit continuation of mbbs courses. (Para 14 , 15) |
JASMEET SINGH, J (ORAL)
1. This is a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following prayers:-
a. “Direct the Respondents to permit the Petitioner to continue attending MBBS classes, and pass such other or further orders as this Hon'bleCourt may deem just, fit, and proper in the interest of justice.
b. Direct the Respondents to extend to the Petitioner the same relief as granted to Ms. Kirtee Koushika Panda, who was similarly situated having been terminated from her MBBS course and being under investigation by the CBI and who, despite being included in the same list of suspected candidates, was permitted by the Hon'ble Supreme Court to continue her MBBS Studies and appear in the end-semest
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
